11/08/2009

Marquette Golden Eagles Basketball Preview


In one year as head coach, Buzz Williams has already put together a fantastic season and a decent NCAA Tournament showing, dealt with adversity, brought in some excellent recruits, and built a foundation to remain competitive.  Departures and an early injury suggest that he's in for a step back this season, and will earn his paycheck this time out.  An intriguing group of transfers and freshmen will keep them out of the absolute basement, but the production of Dominic James, Wes Matthews, and Jerel McNeal will be difficult to replace right away, especially without the help of Junior Cadougan - a freshman expected to run the point before his season ended in practice.  They've also lost a less touted big man - Brett Roseboro - who was released from his scholarship for reasons I'm unsure of.  How far will the dive be?  How quickly will they pick it back up?  The answers to both will depend on how quickly the newcomers can play as a unit.  Even as freshmen they will probably beat some very talented teams and in one, perhaps two, seasons Williams should have a group capable of something special.


Team Info

Head Coach:
Buzz Williams, 2nd season

'08-'09 Results:
25-10 Overall, 13-7 Big East
NCAA Tournament second round (6 seed)

Departing Players:
F Dwight Burke
G Dominic James
G Wesley Matthews
C Liam McMorrow
G Jerel McNeal

Returning Players:
G Maurice Acker (Sr.)
G David Cubillan (Sr.)
F Lazar Hayward (Sr.)
G-F Jimmy Butler (Jr.)
G Robert Frozena (Jr.)
F Joseph Fulce (Jr.)
C Chris Otule (So.)

Newcomers:
G Dwight Buycks (JUCO)
G Darius Johnson-Odom (JUCO)
PG Junior Cadougan (out for season)
PF Jeronne Maymon
C Youssoupha Mbao
SF Erik Williams

(Full Roster)


Nonconference Slate:  Centenary, Maryland-Eastern Shore, Grambling, South Dakota, @ Xavier, North Carolina State, Wisconsin-Milwaukee, @ Wisconsin, North Florida, Presbyterian

Big East home-and-home:  Villanova, DePaul, Providence

Big East Home Opponents:  Georgetown, Rutgers, South Florida, Pittsburgh, Louisville, Notre Dame

Big East Road Opponents:  West Virginia, Syracuse, Connecticut, Cincinnati, St. John's, Seton Hall

Old Spice Classic:  Marquette opens this tournament against Xavier; their second opponent will be Creighton or Michigan in the winners' or losers' bracket.  They will also play a third game against Alabama, Baylor, Florida State, or host Iona.


Coaches' Pick:  12th, Big East


Outlook


The Skinny:

The Golden Eagles will almost certainly be led by senior forward Lazar Hayward.  No other returning player averaged as many as six points, and of those players only Jimmy Butler really capitalized on his minutes.  There is a significant amount of incoming talent, but the premature loss of Cadougan (probably the best of the bunch) is going to be felt.  Hayward will probably average something like 19 and 10.  The duo of JUCO transfers were both selected as first team All-Americans in NJCAA, so it's a safe bet that they will produce in the NCAA as well.  Erik Williams, Jeronne Maymon, and Youssoupha Mbao will probably mature into solid players, and how fast that happens will be something worth following.  If they hit their stride right away they could still finish in the top half of the conference...but the more likely scenario has them taking their lumps this year only to completely surprise those who don't pay attention next.

Best Case:

If Hayward is dominant to his fullest potential, he will still need help to take this team anywhere in his senior season.  Some of that help will come in the form of Buycks and Johnson-Odom; if they don't miss a beat the trio will be formidable.  If Maurice Acker, Jimmy Butler, or David Cubillan can elevate the level of play, it would go a long way toward easing the transition from Tom Crean's players to Williams's.  Added strong play from each of the freshmen could make this team much better than expected.  A particularly strong showing in the Old Spice Classic is probably too much to expect, but their best effort could net them third place, which would still be likely to carry them to league play at 10-2.  Sweeps of both DePaul and Providence are not out of the question, but Villanova should be too much for them.  The home schedule offers two more excellent chances for wins, and knocking off an unexpected opponent on their court is almost a given.  A glance at the six remaining road opponents, however, looks very difficult and more than two wins is probably a stretch.  If we're keeping score, that would get them to 19-11, 9-9 and firmly on the bubble.  The Big East tournament would give them the opportunity to make or break their case.

Worst Case:

Unfortunately, Hayward is the only sure thing.  The transfers will probably give good minutes, but if they aren't great minutes it will put quite a burden on the freshman class.  It's not hard to imagine the other returning players as ineffective...and if that is the case leadership may be too much to add to Hayward's plate.  That could spell big problems.  Every team in the Old Spice Classic is capable of putting together the game to beat them, and it would be easy to come out of that tournment 0-3 with little confidence and fall to NC State.  A loss at Wisconsin is likely, and this would result in a 7-5 nonleague mark.  The wrong bounces could leave them 1-5 in their home-and-homes, and they could lose every road game in the league.  Their home schedule toughens up late, and on that kind of season it might be tough to get up to beat Pitt, Louisville, or the Irish.  A 3 or 4 win season in the Big East could be ahead if things begin to spiral on them.

My Best Guess:
15-15 Overall, 6-12 Big East (12th place), plus a loss to a hungry South Florida team in the Big East Tournament if the standings match my projection.  Don't worry though, Marquette fans - there's a great class incoming and another taking shape behind it.



Marquette logo from campofchamps.com
Buzz Williams photo from SI.com
Lazar Hayward photo from msnbc.com
Old Spice Classic logo from infinitotravel.net
NJCAA logo from potomacstatecollege.edu

11/07/2009

South Florida Bulls Basketball Preview


Since joining the Big East in '05-'06, South Florida has never finished above 14th place, never won more than four games, and never won a league tournament game (last year was the first in which teams 13th or lower participated).  So, it is a modest statement to say that this may be South Florida's best year since joining the Big East.  The bottom of the league has weakened around them: DePaul loses Dar Tucker, Rutgers loses Anthony Farmer and JR Inman, Providence loses an entire roster, and Marquette joins the ranks of those likely to finish low in the standings after several departures.  This all happens while they have perhaps the best roster since the merger.  The only departure of real significance was Jesus Verdejo, and they bring in a JUCO transfer (Jarrid Famous) who may be capable of replacing those numbers immediately. Yet, there are still ten or eleven Big East teams entering the year with rosters that appear superior on paper.  Improvement on last year's best in-conference effort is certainly an achievable goal, but expecting more than a couple games or spots in the standings is perhaps too ambitious.


Team Info


Head Coach:
Stan Heath, 3rd season

'08-'09 Results:
9-22 Overall, 4-15 Big East
no postseason

Departing Players:
G Gaby Belardo
F Eladio Espinosa
F Ajayi Mobolaji
G Jesus Verdejo
F Aris Williams

Returning Players:*
G Chris Howard (Sr.)
G Ryan Kardok (Sr.)

G Mike Mercer (Sr.)
C Alex Rivas (Sr.)
F Ron Anderson (Jr.)
G Dominique Jones (Jr.)
G Anthony Crater (So.)
G BJ Daniels (So.)
F-C Augustus Gilchrist (So.)
G Justin Leemow (So.)

Newcomers:
F-C Jarrid Famous (JUCO)
G Mike Burwell
G Jordan Dumars
F Toralyn Fitzpatrick
G Shaun Noriega

(Full Roster)

*Note:  F Mitch Emory appears as a walk-on on some sites, but the team site does not list him on the '08-'09 or '09-'10 rosters.

Nonconference Slate:  @ Southern Methodist, Davidson, Kent State, Florida Atlantic, Hampton, Central Michigan, Central Florida, @ San Francisco, @ San Diego

Big East home-and-home:  Notre Dame, Cincinnati, Providence

Big East Home Opponents: West Virginia, Rutgers, Seton Hall, Pittsburgh, St. John's, Connecticut


Big East Road Opponents:  Louisville, Syracuse, Georgetown, Marquette, Villanova, DePaul

Charleston Classic:  @ Davidson is the opening round of this tournament.  South Florida will then face either LaSalle or South Carolina in the winners' or losers bracket.  They will also play a third game against Tulane, Miami, UNC-Wilmington, or Penn State.  All eight participants will be placed.

Coaches' Pick: 14th, Big East


Outlook

The Skinny:

Dominique Jones, Mike Mercer, Augustus Gilchrist, and Jarrid Famous provide a talented group of starters.  They're the reason I think this might be the Bulls' best roster and why they have a good chance to post their best Big East finish.  But there are concerns about depth, and in order for the team to deliver on that ambition someone else will have to give them better minutes.  Chris Howard, Alex Rivas, and Ron Anderson are good candidates but have yet to post great numbers.  Toralyn Fitzpatrick is worth keeping an eye on, as well.  The play of that second foursome could be the difference between a fade to last place and continued improvement.  I worry the most about rebounding.  They have players capable of scoring, but their best returning rebounder was a guard (Jones) with 5.6 per game.  That will absolutely have to improve to keep afloat in a league that makes you pay for giving second chances.

Best Case:


It will seem inconsistent that the best case for teams I have behind the Bulls are better than this one - but it is more a product of comparing schedules.  If the four guys I expect to be solid deliver and the others step up, they could show very well before league play starts.  Virginia is beatable, and I believe they are capable of beating Davidson to open the Charleston Classic.  Even their best probably gets them a loss to South Carolina, but they could go 2-1 to finish fifth.  They are probably bound to lose one of their two west coast games due to travel, but a nine or ten win nonconfernce performance is believable.  It gets hairy after that.  I see them at most winning one of the four games against Notre Dame and Cincinnati.  They might sweep Providence but it's tough to count on.  I only see two more winnable road games, and one "sure thing" at home (Rutgers).  They could knock off maybe two superior teams as well.  So, that runs their record to 17-13, 7-11.  They could get their first win in the Big East tournament as well and cross their fingers on an NIT invite.

Worst Case:

As much as I like their chances to improve, the wheels could come off.  If no one steps up behind their four most talented players it could be very difficult for those guys to carry the load.  If that happens, they could wind up in seventh or eighth place in the Charleston Classic, lose five or so more nonleague games and limp into conference play at 4-8.  A last place finish in the league, with a record of 2-16 or 3-15 could easily follow, along with another immediate dismissal from the Garden.  That kind of season would raise some real questions about Stan Heath's job, but it wouldn't be entirely surprising.

My Best Guess:
13-17 Overall, 6-12 Big East (13th place) plus a round one win in the Big East tournament.  There still won't be a postseason, but they will have their best Big East season to date (marginally).

11/06/2009

Providence Friars Basketball Preview


It's unusual to see a program's players vacate on the level this team has seen since their NIT run a few months ago without violations, sanctions, coaching changes, or some other turmoil.  Nine players are gone, and those nine players were responsible for almost exactly two-thirds of the Friars' scoring (1701 of 2577 points).  Eight players do return, but only four of those saw as much as a single minute in '08-'09 (and only three scored).  So coach Keno Davis has the unenviable challenge of integrating twelve newcomers with exceptional talent Sharaud Curry and decent wing Marshon Brooks.  It's hard to imagine losing that much from a team that was bounced from the first round of the NIT and competing in a league that always fields at least ten quality teams.  Davis does have a good group of kids coming in who could grow together into a deep and dangerous team...but no one on the roster has the makeup that says "I will make you forget about the guys who left."  Pictured to the left and right are the five biggest departing contributors.




Team Info

Head Coach:
Keno Davis, 2nd season

'08-'09 Results:
19-14 Overall, 11-9 Big East
NIT first round (5 seed)

Departing Players:
F Chris Baudinet
F Brian Beloin
G-F Weyinmi Efejuku

F-C Randall Hanke
F Connor Heine
F-C Jonathan Kale
G Alex Kellogg
F Geoff McDermott
G Jeff Xavier

Returning Players:
G Luke Burchett (Sr.)
G Sharaud Curry (Sr.)
C Ray Hall (Sr.) - DNP '08-'09
G Brian McKenzie (Sr.)
G-F Marshon Brooks (Jr.)
G Chris Carter (Jr.) - DNP '08-'09
F Jamine Peterson (So.) - DNP '08-'09

Newcomers:
C Russ Permenter (JUCO)
G-F Kyle Wright (JUCO)
F-C Bilal Dixon (RS)
PF Kadeem Batts
PG Vincent Council
G Xavier Davis
PG Johnnie Lacy
SG Duke Mondy
C James Still

(Full Roster)

Nonconference Slate:  Bryant, Bucknell, Mercer, @ Alabama, Vermont, Boston College, @ Northeastern, @ Rhode Island, Brown, @ George Washington, Yale

Big East home-and-home:  Marquette, South Florida, Syracuse


Big East Home Opponents: Louisville, Rutgers, Connecticut, Georgetown, West Virginia, Seton Hall

Big East Road Opponents: Notre Dame, St. John's, DePaul, Cincinnati, Villanova, Pittsburgh


World Vision Invitational:  PC's first three games are part of this round-robin tournament, an event which the Friars are hosting.

Coaches' Pick:  13th Big East


Outlook

The Skinny:

This season is going to swing on development.  If that happens fast, the Friars might be able to creep up the Big East standings.  If it doesn't, this could be a mess.  Curry and Brooks are going to be solid but the rest will need to pull together quickly if anything is to be made of the season.  The good news is that even if the year ends with a terrible record the experience will be invaluable to the young guys.  Taking their lumps now may lead to real success in the future.  Success may well turn on the ability of Bilal Dixon and Russ Permenter to hold it down up front.  Curry is perfectly capable of putting up 20+ from time to time...and the more often he does so the more games they will win.

Best Case:

If Curry, Brooks, Dixon, Permenter, and Wright can all mesh immediately, they could win all three games in the World Vision Basketball Invitational on their way to a 10-2 start.  It will also take an improvement by Brian McKenzie and solid minutes from two or three other players, but it's possible.  Even under the best of circumstances, there are only three road Big East games that look winnable (Marquette, South Florida, and DePaul) but they could capture six or seven at home...though that would take some surprises.  That would put them at 19-11, 9-9 and in good shape for an NIT bid.  A lot would depend on how many wins they could add in the Big East tournament.

Worst Case:

Before I proceed: I haven't mentioned this yet, but my "worst case" for each team does not include the possibility of injury to a major player; I am assuming an intact and healthy roster.  With that out of the way...
It's certainly believable that Curry and Brooks will regress somewhat with less talent around them.  If that happens, and the leadership collapses, it could be difficult for the freshmen to assert themselves, especially once league play gets going.  Beyond those two, most minutes will be coming from players who haven't logged any minutes on the D-I hardwood which of course carries a lot of uncertainty.  If none of the youngsters step up they could be looking at a record something like 10-20, 4-14; a finish like that would not put them in a good position heading to New York.

My Best Guess:
14-16 Overall, 5-13 Big East (14th place) plus at most one win in MSG.  They will show well before conference play begins, but their youth will hurt them in the league games.

11/05/2009

Rutgers Scarlet Knights Basketball Preview



Rutgers enters the 2009-2010 basketball season with something of a foul taste in its mouth.  With a roster that included Anthony Farmer, JR Inman, Corey Chandler, Mike Rosario, and Gregory Echenique they expected to win a modest but respectable number of Big East games.  Instead they won two, and Farmer and Inman are gone. Chandler has been dismissed from the team, as well. There is one intriguing recruit and a JUCO transfer added to the mix, along with a couple of lesser-known freshmen, so this is probably close to the same team in terms of talent. Can Fred Hill get a little more out of them this year?  One thing in their favor is the brutal schedule they played last year.  That slate featured 11 games against NCAA tournament teams (including all four #1 seeds), five more against NIT teams, and a stretch during which six of seven opponents were ranked fifteen or higher.  So they are certainly prepared to take the court against difficult teams.


Team Info

Head Coach:
Fred Hill, 4th season

'08-'09 Results:
11-21 Overall, 2-17 Big East
no postseason

Departing Players:
G Anthony Farmer
G-F Jaron Griffin
F JR Inman
G Corey Chandler

Returning Players:
C Hamady Ndiaye (Sr.)

G Mike Coburn (Jr.)
F Gregory Echenique (So.)
F Patrick Jackson (So.)
F Tomasz Kokosinski (So.)
G Mike Kuhn (So.)
G Mike Rosario (So.)

Newcomers:
G James Beatty (JUCO)
F Jonathan Mitchell (transfer, Florida)
G Mohamed Hasani (Kosovo)
PF Austin Johnson
F Dane Miller
C Brian Okam


(Full Roster)



Nonconference Slate:  Marist, Drexel, Vermont, Massachusetts, Princeton, Colgate, Monmouth, Rider, NJIT, St. Peter's, @ North Carolina

Big East home-and-home:  Georgetown, DePaul, Seton Hall

Big East Home Opponents:  Cincinnati, Syracuse, Villanova, Notre Dame, St. John's, Connecticut


Big East Road Opponents:  West Virginia, Providence, South Florida, Marquette, Louisville, Pittsburgh


Legends Classic:  The Drexel and Vermont games are regional openers for this tournament.  Rutgers will then face UMass in a preset semifinal in Atlantic city, and finally either Michigan State or Florida in the consolation or championship game.


Coaches' Pick: 15th, Big East


Outlook

The Skinny:

Rosario and Echenique carried a lot of hope with them in coming to Rutgers last year, but largely failed to deliver on it.  Rosario is clearly thier best talent, and he did put up very good freshman numbers, but it remains to be seen if Echenique can carry the load up front.  He'll get help if Jonathan Mitchell turns in better performances than his average game for Florida, and if true freshman Dane Miller is able to contribute right away. JUCO transfer James Beatty should be able to make up for most of what was lost in Anthony Farmer, but there's always a question mark when these athletes switch to Division I competition.  Another story worth keeping an eye on is the performance of Mohamed Hansi out of Europe; he could be an unexpected boost.  So there are a lot of intriguing players on this roster, but as each one save Rosario comes with a question mark I suspect this will not lead to any great heights.  If they are to surprise people they will need better contributions (and some stronger leadership) to returning players Hamady Ndiaye, and Mike Coburn.

Best Case:

Understand that what I'm about to say will take something akin to the aligning of planets...but since we have seen such things in the sports world before I will be true to the term "Best Case."  If Rosario adds even a little more to his game, pushing his average to 18-20 points; if Echenique and Ndiaye prove that their lackluster numbers were a product of the elite frontcourt competition last year; and if Beatty, Mitchell (who does have a national title, by the way), Miller, and Hasani all produce - the Knights could ride into conference play with a surprising 9-2 record.  This would include losses to North Carolina and to Michigan State in the Legends Classic championship game.  They could sweep a two game set at DePaul, split with both Seton Hall and Georgetown (two teams who I think will fail to meet expectations) and rattle off 4-5 more Big East wins.  That kind of performance would land them at around 17-12, 8-10 with a chance for another win or two in the Garden.  That kind of season could carry with it an invite to the NIT.

Worst Case:

The flip side of course (which I unfortunately see as the more likely scenario) could involve the wheels falling off very early.  Since Rosario is the only "sure thing" on the roster, a regression by him could easily cost them some games they should win.  This will especially be true if the returning bigs fail to step up in the way that's needed.  Both transfers are unproven in Division I, and could easily disappoint.  This combination would make it very hard for the incoming freshmen to adjust, whatever their talent level.  A series of disasters like that could well get them a record closer to 7-22, 3-15.

My Best Guess:

11-18 Overall, 4-16 Big East (15th place) with an opening round loss in the Big East tournament.  I know it isn't optimistic, but I just wouldn't count on more than half of the questions to be answered favorably.

11/04/2009

DePaul Blue Demons Basketball Preview

Jerry Wainwright's hot seat might be the hottest among very hot hot seats in Division I after the 0-18 regular season Big East campaign of a year ago.  The problem goes deeper than the 0-18 mark, as Wainwright has watched one Chicago area recruit after another choose a different program.  That, coupled with a thinner roster which almost assures that any improvement will be marginal, makes him something of a lame duck coach...and that can't make his job of winning basketball games in an extremely tough and very deep league any easier.  So where's the bright side?  It may be in turning the program over to new leadership.  Perhaps with a new coach this program can begin to woo some of those local kids - as any BCS affiliated program in the right hands should be doing.  For the immediate future, though, it's hard to imagine any scenario that doesn't end with DePaul buried in the basement of this behemoth of leagues.


Team Info


Head Coach:
Jerry Wainwright, 4th season

'08-'09 Results:
9-24 overall, 1-19 Big East
no postseason

Departing Players:
G Jabari Currie
C Matija Poscic
F Dar Tucker

Returning Players:
G Will Walker (Sr.)
F-C Mac Koshwal (Jr.)
F Mario Stula (Jr.)
G Michael Bizoukas (So)
C Krys Faber (So)
F Devin Hill (So)
G Jeremiah Kelly (So)
C Kene Obi (So)

Newcomers:
G Mike Stovall (JUCO)
G-F Eric Wallace (transfer, Ohio State)
G Joe Belcaster
F Tony Freeland
G Nate Rogers
G Ryan Siggins

(Full Roster)

Nonconference Slate: Columbia, @ Northern Iowa, Detroit, Alabama State, @ Vanderbilt, @ Mississippi State, Illinois-Chicago, American, Texas State, Florida Gulf Coast

Big East home-and-home: St. John's, Marquette, Rutgers

Big East Home Opponents: Georgetown, Providence, West Virginia, Syracuse, Louisville, South Florida

Big East Road Opponents: Pittsburgh, Villanova, Notre Dame, Connecticut, Seton Hall, Cincinnati

Coaches' Pick: 16th Big East

Outlook

The Skinny:

They lose the best player (Dar Tucker) from a disastrous season, which is seldom an omen of impending greatness.  They do return a talented guard in Will Walker and a big man who can be dominant at times in Mac Koshwal.  Some help is on the way, as well.  Mike Stovall and Eric Wallace transfer in, and though they seem like roleplayers at best by Big East standards they will shore up the depth a bit.  That freshman class isn't on any watch lists, but they do look like a group of kids that could be coached up in time.  The nonconference slate is a mixed bag, featuring seven opponents that should be inferior, one relative unknown that may be an NCAA tournament team (Northern Iowa), and two very good SEC teams.  The Big East was kind to them in scheduling repeat opponents, but the road schedule is a murderer's row of teams that are excellent, difficult to beat at home, or both.  They may well end up a worse team than last year but with a better record.

Best Case:

If things go right, they could finish the ooc games at 8-2 by taking down Northern Iowa and winning the games they should.  Once Big East play starts, they host five beatable teams (St. John's, Marquette, Rutgers, Providence, and South Florida) so of course the best case counts those as wins.  I don't see more than two road wins for them, but they could surprise a better team at home.  If they add two wins in the league tournament that would get them to 18-13, 10-11 Big East.  In order to make this happen, though, Will Walker will have to have an All-Conference caliber season, Mac Koshwal will have to get his head on straight, the transfers will have to be hidden talents, and someone like Faber, Hill, or Kelly will have to step up in a big way.  Even that kind of season may not save Wainwright's job or get them to the NIT.

Worst Case:

If things don't go right, this season could be another disaster.  Without a stable Koshwal or good contributions fromt he newcomers they could finish the noncon with as many as five losses. Since the league features several depleted rosters and the schedule is favorable, even the worst possible performance will include a Big East win...but the wrong matchup in the Garden will send them home the first day.  This kind of season would leave them at 7-24, 2-17 Big East.

My Best Guess:

11-18 Overall, 3-15 Big East (16th place) plus a loss in round one of the Big East tournament.  This will keep them out of the postseason but in the hunt for a new coach.

11/03/2009

Stats 101: Lesson 1, Passer Rating


Possibly the most used and least understood stat in sports conversation these days is the quarterback passer rating.  It's a trendy stat to use in water-cooler football talk, but it seems few fans realize what they mean when they cite it. It's a good, and fairly robust, stat because it incorporates multiple aspects of a player's performance into a single number.  Still, as we'll see, it may soon need some measure of adjustment to better reflect a changing game - especially if it is to be used to compare quarterbacks from different eras.  Wikipedia has an excellent entry on the subject, which served as the starting point for my research.  The NFL's official explanation is frankly lacking in detal.


The Basics

The passer rating is always a number between zero and 158.3, and is calculated from four components that are each limited to values between 0 and 2.375.  The components measure a quarterback's completion percentage [C], yards per attempt [Y], touchdowns per attempt [T], and interceptions per attempt.  The formula expressed in these terms is [(C + Y + T + I)/6] x 100 = passer rating.  The beauty of this formua is that it tracks all of the major passing statistics without regard to how often a quarterback throws the ball.  With each component calculated per attempt, it removes the problem of comparing a QB whose team passes 66% of the time to one whose team runs 66% of the time, for example.

The easiest mistake to make is to fail to set the limits to each of the components.  I will be pointing this out multiple times as we go on, because if limits are not used the resulting number is meaningless.  It is important to note that the formula does not automatically contain these limits.  (The exceptions are that 'I' cannot exceed 2.375 and 'T' cannot be less than 0, so two of eight limits are inherent in the formula.) If you are doing it by hand you must change all results below zero to zero and all results above 2.375 to 2.375.  If you are using a spreadsheet, you must set each component's minimum and maximum values.  The best way to illustrate why this is bad is with the "perfect pass."  If a quarterback attempts one pass, which is a completion for a 100-yard touchdown, the resulting passer rating would be 669.07 without constraints.  Conversely, if one pass is attempted and picked off the resulting passer rating without constraints is -414.58.  Ouch.

The other easy-to-make mistake is to confuse the NFL's passer rating with the NCAA's version, called  passing efficiency.  The NCAA formula uses different coefficients for each component and does not have bounds.  I'm discussing passer rating because 1) it is more widely known and 2) it is frankly a lot more meaningful.


The Components

"So how the heck do you calculate the components?  Stop telling us how NOT to find a passer rating and tell us how TO find one."

I know, right?  Here we go.

Completion percentage is given as C = [(Comp/Att x 100)-30]/20.  Note that this could range from -1.5 to 3.5, so the limits must be set.

Yards per attempt is given as Y = (yards/ATT -3) x 1/4.  Note that this could range from -0.75 to 24.25, so again the limits must be set.

Touchdowns per attempt is given as T = (TD/ATT) x 20.  Note that this could range from 0 to 20, so the upper limit must be set.

Interceptions per attempt is given as I = 2.375 - [(INT/ATT) x 25]. Note that this could range from -22.625 to 2.375, so the lower limit must be set.

So there it is; all you need to calculate a passer rating.  If you're one of those who loves to tinker with things, you can do some algebra and express the formula in a number of different ways.  The most straightforward, of course, is to plug in the expressions for C,Y,T,I into the master formula and simplify.  I prefer to calculate each component separately, because it is easier to remember to impose limits, if necessary.  Remember that any time you algebraically rearrange this formula you must do some calculations to retain the limits.

Then again, you could always cheat. Several such sites exist.  But that's no fun.


History and Answers to Some Obvious Questions

The passer rating seems to have entered the vernacular only recently, but it has been around since 1973 and has been retroactively applied to all NFL seasons.  It was the brainchild of Don Smith, one-time Pro Football Hall of Fame veep.  66.6 was intended as the standard, and although that was an approximation of the average passer at the time the league average has recently risen to above 80.  If this trend continues, it may make sense to adjust the maximum value of each component to compensate for the increased efficiency of the passing game.  For now, this is not a major problem as the perfect passer rating is rarely obtained even for a single game.

Q: I get zero, but why 2.375?
A: This limiting value was decided upon to obtain the "average" of 66.6, based on passing stats available in 1973.

Q: Why set limits at all?
A: The formula was designed as a sliding scale calculation in accordance with the law of diminishing returns.  Simply put, the designers did not want exceptionally poor or outstanding performances to produce uselessly inflated numbers.  (See above)


Flaws

Like any stat measuring individual performance in a team sport, the passer rating has its flaws.  For example, it cannot take into account interceptions or dropped passes that are not a mistake of the quarterback.  It also is not weighted for strength of opposing defenses, nor does it account for teammates.  How good is the offensive line?  How many yards after the catch does the receiver post?  This cool site lets you play with the formula by assigning different weights to each component, and even modifying some of the components.  Some of the results can be really illuminating - but make sure you pay attention to what you are doing to the numbers to know what your changes mean.


Another problem is that nothing a quarterback does on the ground is taken into consideration...although this is not a flaw, per se, given the formula's intent, (to measure passing, not quarterbacks).  As the passer rating has gained wider use as a sign of general QB quality, this has become a flaw.

Finally, I must here reiterate the changing nature of the game.  The limits set in 1973 are becoming increasingly suspect as the average passer rating increases.  It is probably worthwhile to a) establish era or year coefficients when comparing quarterbacks across time or b) redesign the formula with new maximums.  However, even without adjustment the passer rating remains a useful tool for comparison of quarterbacks who are contemporaries.


Further Applications

Leave it to a nerd like me to be excited by the prospects of what the passer rating could be used for but isn't yet.  It is already a powerful tool, but it has the potential to be much more powerful.  A dedicated (amateur or professional) statistician could answer a lot of intriguing questions through creative use of the passer rating.  For example:

How much does a great WR help a quarterback?

One could calculate, for example, Peyton Manning's passer rating to Marvin Harrison versus other receivers.  Or, track a wide receiver's effect on the passer rating of his quarterback as he switches teams.  One could even isolate a passer rating when a given WR is on the field to determine the indirect effect he has by drawing coverage, blocking, etc.  It could be an indirect way of discovering who brings what that doesn't show up in the box score.

How much does a good running game effect passer rating?

Any number of correlations could be established here.  It's always been a fundamental principle of some coaching philosophies that a good ground game opens up the passing game, and that balance is important.  One way of confirming or denying this would be to view how passer rating changes with the effectiveness of a running back.

What defenses are actually effective versus the pass?

How about checking on passer rating versus the prevent defense?  I have no idea what the numbers say, but I'd be willing to bet they would make coaches and DCs think twice about using this set too often.  Or: How do certain defensive schemes alter a given passer's rating?  Useful tools indeed for game planning and playbooks.

How does passer rating change with the weather?

Maybe this one is silly, but I'm curious.  Does the cold really make it harder?  How about wind, rain, and snow?

What routes yield the highest passer rating?

Is a short hook more likely to give a good rating?  How about a deep ball, a slant, or a cross?  Another way to edit that playbook.

Design your own.  The possibilities are limitless.


So, I hope you have left here more informed about the passer rating.  Now you can snigger at your friends who draw outrageous conclusions and wow them with your ability to calculate them .

11/02/2009

Complete 2009-2010 Big East Preview

Intro:

It’s November, and to people like me that means one thing: college basketball. Specifically the last few years it has meant Big East basketball, and so it seems appropriate to debut my brand new sports blog in early November with a Big East Preview.

The Big East got seven bids in last year’s NCAA tournament, pulling down three number one seeds and advancing four teams to the Elite Eight and two to the Final Four. It also placed three teams in the NIT and one in the CBI, with Cincinnati declining an invitation to that tournament. It was a fairly successful season for a league some speculated would receive as many as nine or ten NCAA tournament bids. So what can we expect of this year’s version? Will the usual suspects be contending for a league title? Who’s in for a severe drop in the standings and who will make a move? I hope to answer all these questions and more.

The league will not be as deep or as thick around the middle as last year’s iteration. The mass exodus of talented players will see to that. Here’s an alphabetical list of key players that have graduated or jumped to the NBA: Jeff Adrien, Dwayne Anderson, Craig Austrie, Ryan Ayers, DeJuan Blair, Earl Clark, Shane Clark, Dante Cunningham, Eric Devendorf, Weyinmi Efejuku, Anthony Farmer, LeVance Fields, Jonny Flynn, Randall Hanke, Paul Harris, Dominic James, Jonathan Kale, Kyle McAlarney, Geoff McDermott, Jerel McNeal, A.J. Price, Alex Ruoff, Jessie Sapp, DaJuan Summers, Hasheem Thabeet, Dar Tucker, Jesus Verdejo, Wesley Matthews, Mike Williams, Terrance Williams, Jeff Xavier, and Sam Young. Wow!

And yet, there is still plenty of love for Big East teams. The AP and Coaches' Polls rank 5 and 6 teams, respectively, with eight teams receiving votes. Gary Parrish of CBS likes seven. Jeff Goodman of Fox is a little more reserved. The influx of freshman (and in some cases, transfer) talent makes up for a lot of the departures. With a few of the ordinarily strong programs set to reload or rebuild, a few of the less successful programs in recent years may have a chance to make some noise. None of these polls give a mention to Cincinnati or St. John’s (teams poised to make a run) or Seton Hall (a team with a lot of talent that I personally am less high on). Fewer power teams at the top I believe will lead to more NCAA bids than last year, as the eighth and ninth place teams will thus have better opportunities to build resumes.

Projecting the standings:

Each team will get its own preview in forthcoming posts, but I’ll give my bottom line here, as well as where I think each team will land in the postseason.

1. Villanova – They’ve got the right combination of returning and incoming talent to be the favorite. They could field three starting backcourts capable of playing at this level. They lose a lot up front but have the recruiting class to fill those holes admirably.
(NCAA tournament)

2. West Virginia – The trio of Devin Ebanks, Da’Sean Butler, and Darryl Bryant is reminiscent of Young, Blair, Fields and will probably post similar numbers. There are two reasons they aren’t the favorite in my eyes: less depth than Villanova and a penchant for getting in trouble. I don’t trust Huggins to keep the group out of off-court trouble.
(NCAA tournament)

3. Connecticut – Few programs at any given time could lose the likes of Jeff Adrien, AJ Price, Hasheem Thabeet, and Craig Austrie and compete for a league title the very next year. Right now, Connecticut is one of those programs. Another Final Four may be out of reach, but they will be among the Big East contenders from day one.
(NCAA tournament)

4. Cincinnati – This is one of those teams that seems to be flying under the radar, but their talent level is impressive. Deonta Vaughn will be in the running for Big East POY, helped by turning over the point to the talented Cashmere Wright. They bring in a solid recruiting class headlined by “born ready” Lance Stephenson. Don’t be surprised when they earn a high seed and make a deep run in March.
(NCAA tournament)

5. Louisville – Earl Clark and Terrance Williams are gone, but a lot of talent is back. There is a deep (and underappreciated) backcourt rotation: Reginald Delk, Jerry Smith, Edgar Sosa, Preston Knowles, and Kyle Kuric all averaged .290 or better in points per minute (PPM), and they are joined by Peyton Silva and Mike Marra. Terrance Jennings, Samardo Samuels, and Rakeem Buckles will hold it down up front.
(NCAA tournament)

6. Syracuse – Arinze Onuaku was the least appreciated big man in last year’s stacked Big East. He’ll get a chance to show off what he’s got in a depleted league, alongside transfer Wesley Johnson (who averaged 12.4 points in the Big 12) and freshman Mookie Jones. The backcourt is a concern, but with Jim Boeheim already naming freshman Brandon Triche the starting PG perhaps less than it appears.
(NCAA tournament)

7. Georgetown – A lot of media sources are ranking this team…but I’m not buying it. I do think they will improve on last year’s finish, but mostly because of how much they underperformed that year. It will be hard to lose DaJuan Summers and Jessie Sapp from a team that lost in the first round of the NIT and make any serious noise. Still, Chris Wright, Austin Freeman, and Greg Monroe are a talented core. Much will ride on the freshman class, especially Hollis Thompson.
(NCAA tournament)

8. St. John’s – Norm Roberts has more talent here than he gets credit for, and it has grown together. Anthony Mason, Jr. is out for a few weeks, and how soon he returns will directly correlate with how much this team achieves. Mason, DJ Kennedy, Sean Evans, Paris Horne, Justin Burrell, and Rob Thomas all average .340 points per minute or better…no other Big East team returns six players with such scoring efficiency. The Johnnies add two JUCO transfers and a top 100 recruit. As long as Mason gets healthy, they should finish in the top half this year.
(NCAA tournament)

9. Pittsburgh – Talent? Check. Experience? Not so much. Jamie Dixon and this program have proven that they can bring guys along and win without star power, but there is a lot to make up for this time out. I think they could finish anywhere from 6 to 11 in this conference. They will improve as the year goes on, but will it be fast enough?
(NIT)

10. Seton Hall – Here is a team that will either make me look very wise or very foolish. Jeremy Hazell is one of the best returning players in the Big East. No one of real consequence is leaving, and transfers Herb Pope (New Mexico State) and Keon Lawrence (Missouri) will make them better. I still see them as the Hazell show, though, and think that all of the rosters I placed above them just happen to be superior. There is a lot of talent here, enough to maybe prove me very wrong.
(NIT)

11. Notre Dame – Luke Harangody is going to put up monster numbers. And yet, Notre Dame will still struggle to climb the standings. If Harangody’s gifts weren’t enough to help Kyle McAlarney and Ryan Ayers to the NCAA tournament, than what can the team achieve without the other two? The roster is much thinner around the big man this year, despite the transfer of Ben Hansbrough and a decent freshman class.
(NIT)

12. Marquette – I love what Buzz Williams is doing with this program. They lose too much, though, to be a factor in the coming season. James, Matthews, and McNeal are gone, and they have already lost an excellent freshman to injury. The recruiting is going very well, so they’ll be back, but I think the CBI is about the best they can hope for. Don’t be surprised if they turn down an invite from any tournament below the NIT, though.
(CBI)

13. South Florida – The Bulls were a much different team once they added Gus Gilchrist last year. Unfortunately, that happened at about the same time the competition stiffened considerably, so it was hard to tell. They lose little but bring in little, leading most to believe they will be the same team. I think they will be improved with a season together to gel. Still, much higher than thirteenth is a bit ambitious.
(no postseason)

14. Providence – Nine players from the 2008-2009 squad are gone, leaving two talented players to supervise a brand new roster. A couple of JUCO transfers may give them a little life, but Sharaud Curry’s best chance at an NCAA tournament has come and gone. Now they’ll be lucky to stay out of the basement. This bunch might become a worthwhile group with time, but they will earn it with a tough go this season.
(no postseason)

15. Rutgers – I once thought that Mike Rosario and Gregory Echinique could become the centerpieces of a very good team.That just doesn’t look like it will be the case. Beyond those two, this roster is anemic. Unless there are a lot of surprises, this group will be lucky to win five Big East games. I question where their scoring will come from, they don’t have many great rebounders, and they turn the ball over too much. Perhaps JUCO transfer James Beatty will offer some help.
(no postseason)

16. DePaul – I have tried to summon some optimism for this team, but the reality is that Jerry Wainwright and his team are headed for another last-place finish unless something very unexpected happens. Mac Koshwal is very talented but was puzzlingly inconsistent last year, as was his departed teammate Dar Tucker. This is probably the hottest of hot seats in the country.
(no postseason)

For alternative viewpoints, check out the rivals.com preview or take a look at what the coaches have to say.

Individual Awards:


It doesn’t usually fall out by position, but I’m going to draw it up that way for simplicity’s sake. The talent level joining the league is outstanding as well, so much so that I had trouble narrowing it down to a freshman team. Instead, I prepared a “freshmen to watch” section, alphabetical by team.


First Team All-Conference

G Jeremy Hazell, Seton Hall
G Deonta Vaughn, Cincinnati
F Da’Sean Butler, West Virginia
F Lazar Hayward, Marquette
C Luke Harangody, Notre Dame (Conference POY)



Second Team All-Conference

G Scottie Reynolds, Villanova
G Jerome Dyson, Connecticut
F Samardo Samuels
F Anthony Mason, Jr.
C Arinze Onuaku



Third Team All-Conference

G Sharaud Curry, Providence
G Mike Rosario, Rutgers
F Devin Ebanks, West Virginia
F Yancy Gates, Cincinnati
C Greg Monroe, Georgetown


Freshmen to Watch

SF Lance Stephenson – Cincinnati (Conference FOY)

C Alex Oriakhi, G-F Jamal Coombs-McDaniel, SG Darius Smith – Connecticut
SF Hollis Thompson – Georgetown
PG Peyton Silva , PF Rakeem Buckles – Louisville
SF Erik Williams, PF Jeronne Maymon – Marquette
PF Dante Taylor, C Talib Zanna – Pittsburgh
C DaShonte Riley – Syracuse
SF Dominic Cheek, PF Isaih Armwood, PF Mouphtaou Yarou – Villanova
SG Dalton Pepper – West Virginia

There are a couple of final things worth noting about freshmen. First, as the Friars’ roster is bursting with freshmen, certainly some of them will also be worth watching; I am unsure which will shine, though. Second, there are several redshirt freshmen who should fare well: UConn’s Ater Majok, Syracuse’s Mookie Jones, Pitt’s Travon Woodall, and Cincinnati’s Cashmere Wright.

Wrapup:


Even in a "down" year seven or eight teams from the Big East should make the NCAA tournament.  Teams one to eleven in my projections are talented enough to dance if they hit their stride at the right time.  Many teams will rely heavily on freshmen, though, so consistency will be a concern.

Every Big East team save Seton Hall is participating one preseason event or another, and the league's representatives should show well overall.  For a comprehensive list of preseason tournaments, challenges, and invitationals follow this link.

Big East basketball is nearly upon us.  As always, it will be a wild ride from now until March.